WHY have you come at this hour, Crito?
Crito is overwhelmed with emotion with the impending loss of his friend, and is attempting to passionately convince Socrates to run away and avoid his sentence set upon him by the court.
Crito presents many arguments that would be compelling to most men of his time. Socrates lays out the principles that he has chosen to live his life by and challenges Crito to convince him to leave after considering these principles.
Socrates never directly tells Crito he is wrong, but he asks questions that force Crito to ascertain that he is wrong. Crito states that people will think ill of him for not convincing Socrates to run away.
He says that he will get a bad name if people believe that he was unwilling to spend the money to help Socrates. Crito follows this up with telling Socrates to not worry about any persecution his friends would be subject to, if caught assisting Socrates in escaping.
Crito believes the risk of helping Socrates is worth the chance to save him. Crito then moves on to tell Socrates that there are other places where Socrates can move to and continue to live a good life. He tells Socrates that he has friends in Thessaly that can assist Socrates and protect him.
Crito then directs his arguments towards what he personally feels is just and unjust. Crito tells Socrates that he is acting unjust by not doing anything to prevent his sentence being carried out, and that he is enabling his oppressors to act unjust. Crito continues and tells Socrates that he is acting unjust by not considering his children and his responsibility to take care of them.
The first principle is that of Rational Reflection. Rational Reflection is a concept that states when dealing with matters of importance, one should always made the same decision, no matter the outcome on them personally. Socrates believes that in order to be just and fair, he needs to universalize his believes.
It would be wrong for him to throw away his principles, because if he followed them he would be in danger.
The principle of Moral Rectitude, Socrates second principle outlined in this work, states that one should not return a wrong for a wrong. Socrates believes that if he reacts to an unjust action by performing an injustice, he is acting unjust.
The last principle outlined in this work, is that of Just Agreements. Socrates believed that he has a duty to follow agreements that are just, all the time. In the case of agreements that are unjust, Socrates believes you are not bound to honor them.
In some cases, Socratic principles would require him to break the agreements if they are unjust. Socrates uses these three principles to show Crito that his arguments for Socrates running away and not facing his punishment would be unjust, and devalue all that he has worked for and done within his life.
Socrates continues to talk how it is more important to take advice from one qualified person, and not many unqualified people. Socrates contends, that there is a part of ones being that can be injured by acting in an unjust fashion. Crito agrees that this part of the person is some cases, is more important than the physical self.
Crito agrees that a live is not worth living, if lived unjust. Socrates takes this opportunity to address the idea of moving away from Athens, and living elsewhere.
Socrates feels that he has lived his live just, and made just decisions, and he should not stop now, just to save his own life.
If he chooses to leave and live elsewhere, his life will not be worth living unjustly. Socrates believes that he has been treated fairly, and given a fair trial with an opportunity to defend himself. Although he feels the jury made the wrong decision, there is no grounds for him to argue that he has been the victim of an injustice.
Under his principles, breaking any agreements he has would be unjust, due to the fact that the agreements are just. Socrates also analyses his agreements with Athens, and determines that Athens has held up its part of the deal justly.
Athens has provided for him, educated, protected, and fed him fairly. Therefore he is bound by his just agreement, to follow the laws. Socrates argues that by leaving prison by escape, or paying someone off to release him, would be an unjust action.” (Crito) Socrates has always used reason to decipher between wrong and right.
In conclusion, if Socrates would have escaped he believed that his credibility would have been put in doubt by his followers and he would have to . Yes, Crito, that is one fear which you mention, but by no means the only one.
Cr. Fear not. There are persons who at no great cost are willing to save you and bring you out of . Analysis of Plato's Crito.
The life of Socrates provides one example of a someone who seeks a justification for his or her moral actions.
Socrates tries to use REASON (rather than the values embedded in his culture) to determine whether an action is right or wrong. Crito (/ ˈ k r aɪ t oʊ / KRY-toh or / ˈ k r iː t oʊ / KREE-toh; Ancient Greek: Κρίτων) is a dialogue by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. It depicts a conversation between Socrates and his wealthy friend Crito regarding justice (δικαιοσύνη), injustice (ἀδικία), and the appropriate response to injustice.
Crito Response essaysAs I read The Crito it seems to me a confusing and somewhat muddled dialogue. The difficulty Plato faced in composing the dialogue was to somehow justify Socrates.
Mar 02, · Crito Essay, Response to Question Plato’s work, The Crito, explores one of the last days of Socrates’ life. This work is set in Socrates’ prison cell, where Socrates is visited by his close friend Crito.